Classic porn or modern porn?

[wyldside]

Maybe its just nostalgia but I much prefer the classic stuff. Strictly IMO, but back then women were beautiful but they didn't have that barbie quality. Hairy pussy, big boobs that might sag some, imperfections that ill take any day over plastic tits and cosmetic surgery. Not to mention back then it seemed like most of the really enjoyed sex not that they were just moaning or whatever on cue. Kay Parker, Seka, Desiree Cousteau, women like that still have places in my fantasies

[rathb69]

There is more variety these days, but I really liked the full length movies with a plot and sex parodies. More natural looking women (I was not a fan of fake boobs) and no outrageous tattoos (subtle ones are fine).

[jeep]

I didn’t much care about “plot,” but I was focussed to the point of obsession with older, big-boobed, preferably hairy actresses. I pumped out load after load to the likes of Seka, Kay Parker, Honey Wilder… One sort of exception to this physical type was the small-titted Sharon Mitchell, who bore a striking facial resemblance to a woman I worked with and fucked regularly. Those were the days…

[blackboxer500]

Years ago, porn made by pros was all that was available, it seemed, probably because of the need to distribute physical media to a theater or video shop. . And I never really cared for plot lines and so forth, in which way too much time was wasted, for my tastes, before getting to the action. And porn stars all had to be sex goddesses or studs when I would rather see people who look like they knew their way around a grocery store.

Now of course everything is available, and my strong preference is for well made amateur stuff. Everyone has seen the lists of the sexiest people, always celebrities. But I’ve always thought the sexiest people to be people I saw routinely — friends, neighbors, coworkers, regular people who are genuine and accessible. Of course it’s nice when you can see everyone’s face, but I also like the more anonymous stuff where faces are not shown, because it is more like it was posted by a person next door who is horny but does not want to be known for making porn.

And in my amateur porn, I do not want a performance. Rather I want the people to masturbate, have sex, whatever their particular act will be, and I want them enjoying it, like they are having sex and not making a movie per se. It should be as if a camera just happens to be running while they do what they do.

It’s not that they must ignore the camera, but they should not be trying to seduce the observer. For the most part this means they do not break the fourth wall, because 9 times out of 10 that is accompanied by a come-hither look that really messes it up for me. But there are some people can really pull it off, who acknowledge the camera but not in order to look sexy and desirable, but rather in a way that says “I’m having sex the way I like it, and you’re watching, which turns me on.”.

That said, I prefer the amateur filmmaker to care a bit about quality. I don’t want jerky cameras, extreme closeups, or messy backgrounds. I’ve watched hundreds of selfie videos of people masturbating where there’s a bunch of clothes strewn about or some other distraction that takes away from the visual experience. And for goodness sake keep pets and children’s toys out of the picture. That’s an instant turn off.

[spunkluvr]

Classic or modern, if it's gay porn, I'll wank to it.

[spdrah]

Both!

[randiz69]

Classic or modern, if it's gay porn, I'll wank to it.

Cheers to that! All cumshots are timeless.

[smoothwhiteballs]

I believe there is more variety now (which I like), but the classic porn era (70s and 80s?) sure had a good formula. An attempt at plot using good looking people, but not lots of huge fake boobs. The guys who had really big cocks got lots of work, and we usually got lots of good cumshots. A great slow-motion cumshot I still remember was from "Behind the Green Door." I'm pretty sure it was in a group setting, but a girl was sucking a cock, and when she pulled off, it squirted rope after rope of cum on her face and body without her touching it. It seems like they changed the color of the film several times, and we saw his cum in green, blue, yellow, and so forth as it squirted out in slow-motion. I didn't even realize that they were showing a ruined orgasm; I was just watching his cock jump and squirt onto her face.

Modern porns get right to the action, and I love the great closeups with usual good lighting. I especially enjoy seeing a strong cumshot that is well-lit so we can clearly see every spurt of cum; how it squirts, where it lands, etc. I think more anal porn is available now, showing gaping holes and cum oozing out. I don't think classic porn had that.